The SITUATION: the Ben Brooks' dilemma
Ben Brook, 43 years old, a solid professional with 20 years of experience in Livingstone Corp., is extremely disappointed for not he was promoted CEO of his company. For the first time in his life, he is reflecting about his own and professional history and options, trying to get a few lessons for the future. He views quitting his company for a CEO task in another one.
The FACTS: Ben Brooks' personal and professional life
Each of our starting point will be to understand (through a a few pages letter) who Bill is as a person, so that as a professional. We could deduce a lot of key character clues, based on the facts in the letter: An " achiever”: born in 1935, graduated with respects, joins Livingstone at the age of twenty three, promoted to the important location after simply 4 years in the business, promoted most youthful ever Professional VP (35 years old) after more than a decade in the firm. Loyal to the company and proud of this: entire career at Livingstone (20 years) " Work-aholic” at the expense of his family: regularly spend nights and week-ends in the office. Forgets about choosing vacation. Immersed by function, leaves almost all energies in the office and fails in committed some to his partner and kids. One particular anecdote: after divorce, lives in a NYC hotel close to the office. Self-confident: believes others will see and reward him pertaining to his personal professional abilities. Small (or non-e ) circle of friends: having written this letter, at this moment in time, into a professor he has none seen nor talked to in the past two decades seems like a solid sign that he had no one closer with whom talk about his problem.
The ANALYSIS: Ben Brooks' profile
1 . Psychological Type
With the limited information accessible in the notification, we can speculate Ben can be an NT TYPE (" Intuitive Rational”): Ben is fascinated by electric power, he is extremely ambitious and believes he will probably progress and stay recognized as well as rewarded by others due to his personal competences. Even as said, he is a " work-aholic”, his competence seems never enough to him and he lives forever with the dread to " fail” (ie. to not receiving as high as this individual believes he deserves). He could be a " visionary” and permanently difficulties the status-quo: a good example is the " direct cost model” Ben developed and implemented at Livingstone only 2 years after having joined the company.
In his specialist relationships with others, NT types will be arrogant because sense that they can assume a tiny contribution by his peers and crew since, eventually, " they are not as great as I am”. At the same time, because contradictory as it may seem, he can be while highly requiring with others as he is to use himself. The NT types could proceed as far as hurting others' feelings without even observing it.
Well worth noting: there may be nevertheless a single component in Ben's persona which could have led all of us to classify him rather because an SJ type. Bill is dedicated to deliver in the promises and objectives and, in that respect, he values duty above all and dedicates most of his time to his work. That said, an SJ type is also extremely sensitive to others, to bringing harmony to the relationships and his " duty sense” includes more than work to also his family. This really is clearly false for Ben.
To further complete this kind of picture, Ben seems to be associated with an INTROVERTED type: hard to say through the letter nevertheless he would not seem like an extremely social or externally-focused person. He will not seem to be finding his strength from others, but rather via himself great work. This individual definitely favors communicating in written, also to a mentor he hasn't seen since its founding 20 years ago (! ) which evidently shows how little real interest he has in knowing how others (the professor) are doing: this individual dedicates a few pages to talking solely about himself and his problem.
On the fourth axe, Ben seems more like a REASONING type: he enjoys organizing is function and is excited about reaching objectives. That said, we do not have considerably more information about...